) individualizantes que persisten con la expansión del capital financiero, atentando contra las posibilidades de generar bienestar y sustentabilidad. El problema que se nos presenta, es la continuidad de lógicas (. Apoyada en un marco ético político que orienta prácticas sociales que reivindican otros sentidos al trabajo, la economía social representa una crítica a los imperativos productivistas que enmarcan la expansión del mercado y que han generado desequilibrios ecológicos, profundizado proceso de exclusión social. ( shrink)Įn el marco de la crisis civilizatoria, evidenciada por la emergencia sanitaria, reflexionamos sobre la potencialidad que ofrece la economía social solidaria para reconstruir nuestros horizontes sociales. Most notably, a number of students condemned Hardin for his lack of compassion, yet were not willing to act compassionately themselves. Forty percent of all respondents held inconsistent views. A fair number of respondents that stated they would sacrifice said that they would do so because they would benefit personally from the avoidance of guilt and/or from the opportunity to feel good about themselves, suggesting that even seemingly selfless behaviors are sometimes driven by egoistic motivations. ![]() Almost 72% of respondents asserted that they would be willing to intervene to stop the novel coronavirus by sacrificing their retirement. Responses were analyzed and categorized to detect inconsistencies between students’ described views and their willingness to personally sacrifice for the sake of others. Students were then asked to provide written responses stating whether they would personally sacrifice their eventual retirement in order to stop COVID-19 (. In general, students seemed to hold more with Heilbroner’s stance, which left room for compassion, while condemning Hardin’s harshness. ( shrink)ĭuring spring of 2020, environmental ethics students at a medium sized metropolitan university in the Southeastern United States were asked to read and comment on classic essays from Robert Heilbroner and Garrett Hardin, essays regarding our responsibilities towards future generations. By exploring the philosophical foundation of EA, I would like to show how EA is not authentic altruism as it is founded on the sacrifice of the Other whom is supposed to be saved. ![]() ![]() My aim in this paper is to extend the critique but from a different angle, that is, by going back to its philosophical underpinnings. That is, criticism on EA focuses on evaluating the practical realisation of its mandates with little, if any, evaluation on its philosophical foundation. ) the performative or the empirical aspect of the movement. The criticism on EA has been mainly on (. In this article this critique is reinforced from a different point of view. EA arguably does not promote radical institutional change which could lead to an ultimate eradication of the problems that may endanger people’s lives in the first place. The main criticism on EA is that by donating to charities EA leaves fundamental moral issues such as global poverty and injustice intact. Web.Effective Altruism (EA) is both a philosophy and a movement. Lifeboat ethics: The case against helping the poor. Thus, “Lifeboat Ethics” has many arguments confirming the ideas of the author however, the rigidity of these measures causes contradictory feelings in terms of morality and kindness. He also speaks about the limitation of immigrants in wealthy countries, since they are a cheap labor resource, but they also can deplete the reserves of the state. According to Hardin, such measures will help humanity to develop, as well as reduce population growth due to lack of resources. The author uses the metaphor of a lifeboat in which rich countries sail, and they must carefully choose who can be left onboard or pulled out of the water to stay afloat (Hardin, 1974). ![]() However, Hardin (1974) emphasizes that poorer countries should not rely on the help of wealthy states, but learn to plan their budgets and cut costs in the face of limited resources. Besides, humanity and every country should take care of their optimal use by educating their citizens about saving water and food and avoiding air pollution. The author argues that resources should not be accumulated in one part of the world, and they should be evenly distributed between countries.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |